It is odd that the implication is still alive, even here, that there is a virus which can be transmitted from one to the other, when at no time in the entire history of virology has one of these viruses ever been isolated and shown to obey Koch's Postulates for an infectious organism.
Still more odd is the idea that there can be a variant bearing random Greek nomenclature, when there has never been shown to be an original from which the variant can be said to diverge - in fact the basis of the claim rests on the fact that whereas originally, amplification of three primers from the PCR test was required to assert positivity, now only two are required, so in fact a diagnosis of omicron infection can now be made despite the fact that the person would a few short weeks ago have been declared coronavirus negative.
Perhaps the entire tale is a mere clumsy confection, whose purpose is not epidemiological, but economic and totalitarian in its nature and intent.
Oh yes, the virus has been isolated. There are detailed electron micrographs of the virus as well as sequencing of the genome. Don't take some of the unscientific pronouncements of some doctors and equating that with true science. In virology, electron microscopy has been around since the 1960 showing the visualization of viruses.
The point is that we shouldn't fear the virus. Our immune system can handle it if we take care of it. Focusing on this one virus to the exclusion of everything else is insanity.
Repeated requests to governments and scientific institutions worldwide have resulted in not a single one of them producing a specimen of the "virus", all they have is random short sequences which are then assembled into something called "a genome."
This is called "in silico" isolation, and it is a virtual construct, not a real one.
Now these sequences can be put into any arrangement the computer decides is the best fit, and this fit can be varied depending on the latest requirement for a "variant."
Electron microscopes show something which we have been told is a "virus", but there is no purification of this particle, and as I said, no evidence whatsoever that it is infectious; it is far more likely to be what is known as an exosome, ie something which comes from within the cell, and moves outwards into the body fluids, rather than something coming from a wet market, bat, pig, or bird, and moving inwards.
Despite strenuous efforts to take body fluids from sick persons and infect healthy persons with them, it was found to be impossible to generate symptoms of the last global pandemic, ie the "Spanish Flu" in individuals who were healthy, and as it turns out, unvaccinated.
The crucial link between sickness and external factors which might be causing it is thus vaccination; you will recall that the first European fatalities allegedly from this virus occurred amongst heavily vaccinated and elderly sick persons in northern Italy.
All I’ll ask is how much virology have you studied? I guess all those electron micrographs that I studied in university in the 1960s were just made up; and all those virologists have been spinning a tale since the early 1930s…I got it.
The study would have involved differentiating between so called viruses based on their morphology, and relating particular shapes to particular diseases - depending on what you were told about these things.
So it would be better to say that you were indoctrinated with the consensus view back then - nothing of what you learned would have been challenged by you, because like the overwhelming majority of students, you get to where you are by repeating what you are told, not by thinking about any of it.
Your first argument is also what is known as a straw man, because at no time did I ever state or imply that the pictures you saw were "made up."
I simply suggested, and continue to suggest, that they were misinterpreted.
Perhaps a class or two in argumentation might have helped.
You can "study an electron micrograph" as much as you like, and it tells you precious little. It is just a black and white blob taken from a dead cell culture. My point is, how do you know whether it is coming out of the cell, and is thus a normal component of it, or it is going into the cell, from some dead or sick animal from a wet market, and so is not a normal component of it?
Here's a clue - you don't.
The "science" of virology actually began with the notorious fraudster Louis Pasteur, when he tried to get the British navy banned from the Mediterranean because their ships were "infected with a nasty pathogen" - which of course, nobody could see, because they didn't have EM at that time.
I'm sure I've already said this, but at no time has a virus ever been isolated from a sick person, purified, and then used to infect a healthy person, and this is the entire foundation of every sort of study of infectious disease.
Lord knows the doctors tried, during the Spanish Flu epidemic - but they simply couldn't do it, and the same with the "AIDS" epidemic.
All that time you spent listening with rapt attention to your seniors telling you the tall tale about viruses should have been more profitably spent, I think.
"Joe Biden also promised that if you get vaccinated you will not get Covid. The man really did say that."
I didn't recall sleepy Joe saying that probably because I can't last more than 30 seconds after he begins to speak. It is an eerily similar phrase to Obama's promise that you would not have to change your doctor if you signed up for Obamacare.
A quick Christmas season poll. How many of the unjabbed readers have noticed symptoms of sinus pain and stuffy noses after close encounters with their jabberwalker relatives?
It is odd that the implication is still alive, even here, that there is a virus which can be transmitted from one to the other, when at no time in the entire history of virology has one of these viruses ever been isolated and shown to obey Koch's Postulates for an infectious organism.
Still more odd is the idea that there can be a variant bearing random Greek nomenclature, when there has never been shown to be an original from which the variant can be said to diverge - in fact the basis of the claim rests on the fact that whereas originally, amplification of three primers from the PCR test was required to assert positivity, now only two are required, so in fact a diagnosis of omicron infection can now be made despite the fact that the person would a few short weeks ago have been declared coronavirus negative.
Perhaps the entire tale is a mere clumsy confection, whose purpose is not epidemiological, but economic and totalitarian in its nature and intent.
Oh yes, the virus has been isolated. There are detailed electron micrographs of the virus as well as sequencing of the genome. Don't take some of the unscientific pronouncements of some doctors and equating that with true science. In virology, electron microscopy has been around since the 1960 showing the visualization of viruses.
The point is that we shouldn't fear the virus. Our immune system can handle it if we take care of it. Focusing on this one virus to the exclusion of everything else is insanity.
Repeated requests to governments and scientific institutions worldwide have resulted in not a single one of them producing a specimen of the "virus", all they have is random short sequences which are then assembled into something called "a genome."
This is called "in silico" isolation, and it is a virtual construct, not a real one.
Now these sequences can be put into any arrangement the computer decides is the best fit, and this fit can be varied depending on the latest requirement for a "variant."
Electron microscopes show something which we have been told is a "virus", but there is no purification of this particle, and as I said, no evidence whatsoever that it is infectious; it is far more likely to be what is known as an exosome, ie something which comes from within the cell, and moves outwards into the body fluids, rather than something coming from a wet market, bat, pig, or bird, and moving inwards.
Despite strenuous efforts to take body fluids from sick persons and infect healthy persons with them, it was found to be impossible to generate symptoms of the last global pandemic, ie the "Spanish Flu" in individuals who were healthy, and as it turns out, unvaccinated.
The crucial link between sickness and external factors which might be causing it is thus vaccination; you will recall that the first European fatalities allegedly from this virus occurred amongst heavily vaccinated and elderly sick persons in northern Italy.
All I’ll ask is how much virology have you studied? I guess all those electron micrographs that I studied in university in the 1960s were just made up; and all those virologists have been spinning a tale since the early 1930s…I got it.
So, you studied virology in the 60's.
The study would have involved differentiating between so called viruses based on their morphology, and relating particular shapes to particular diseases - depending on what you were told about these things.
So it would be better to say that you were indoctrinated with the consensus view back then - nothing of what you learned would have been challenged by you, because like the overwhelming majority of students, you get to where you are by repeating what you are told, not by thinking about any of it.
Your first argument is also what is known as a straw man, because at no time did I ever state or imply that the pictures you saw were "made up."
I simply suggested, and continue to suggest, that they were misinterpreted.
Perhaps a class or two in argumentation might have helped.
You can "study an electron micrograph" as much as you like, and it tells you precious little. It is just a black and white blob taken from a dead cell culture. My point is, how do you know whether it is coming out of the cell, and is thus a normal component of it, or it is going into the cell, from some dead or sick animal from a wet market, and so is not a normal component of it?
Here's a clue - you don't.
The "science" of virology actually began with the notorious fraudster Louis Pasteur, when he tried to get the British navy banned from the Mediterranean because their ships were "infected with a nasty pathogen" - which of course, nobody could see, because they didn't have EM at that time.
I'm sure I've already said this, but at no time has a virus ever been isolated from a sick person, purified, and then used to infect a healthy person, and this is the entire foundation of every sort of study of infectious disease.
Lord knows the doctors tried, during the Spanish Flu epidemic - but they simply couldn't do it, and the same with the "AIDS" epidemic.
All that time you spent listening with rapt attention to your seniors telling you the tall tale about viruses should have been more profitably spent, I think.
Must be climate change. 🤣🤣
"Joe Biden also promised that if you get vaccinated you will not get Covid. The man really did say that."
I didn't recall sleepy Joe saying that probably because I can't last more than 30 seconds after he begins to speak. It is an eerily similar phrase to Obama's promise that you would not have to change your doctor if you signed up for Obamacare.
A quick Christmas season poll. How many of the unjabbed readers have noticed symptoms of sinus pain and stuffy noses after close encounters with their jabberwalker relatives?
The real issue is this: https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/endgame-take-3-wrapup