Strange how the “vax” pushers never mention one side effect when pushing these EUA concoctions in the media. For any other drug being advertised, the spots include a litany of things which could go wrong. Of course the shots are hailed as “public service” and seem to be excluded from any and all adverse events concerns. Isn’t Bourla a veterinarian?
Jan 31, 2022·edited Jan 31, 2022Liked by Vasko Kohlmayer
There are no side effects with a new drug put out in an emergency. None are known. Under an EUA, they also do not have to disclose ingredients or have consistency between batches. You really are a lab rat. It mystifies me how ANYBODY would be willing to inject themselves with this - note - my own doctor volunteered for the first Moderna trial...The scary thing is, they seem to be making every effort not to admit to any adverse events and deaths even as data keeps rolling in. The government is also blocking any effective early treatment. This does not bode well for the herd.
Well, let's think about this for a second. If you go see your doctor and they think you need some medicine for some treatment, will they ever say, "this is not safe or effective, but let's give it a try!"?
In fact, I've never been given a prescription in my life that has not come with a very lengthy list of possible adverse reactions and dangerous drug interactions. Never a word about that.
I was given an antibiotic and went into anaphylaxis, had to go to the ICU, a few years back. A second antibiotic of the same family was prescribed and I developed severe tendon problems because of it which is a known possibility. I learned of this, of course, after the fact and not even from my doctor.
My doctor, upon hearing all of this went for a third common antibiotic and exclaim that was "since you're so sensitive." Not a conciliatory word. Just press on with some other drug and again, absent a single word of possible adverse reactions.
This is "the science" today. This is modern medicine. This is why I have abandoned all prescription meds and no longer even have "my doctor". Unless and until I am on deaths door and its knocking loudly, I'm through with this practice.
I do use medicinal herbs from a licensed practitioner and occasionally some acupuncture. After this culling by experimental gene therapy, you have to be insane to not rethink involving your life with pharmaceuticals and the evil people that push them.
My mother went into a coma after a single Trovan pill. They lined her up for a liver transplant due to that single pill. We didn't know that Trovan was, at that very moment, being pulled from the market due to liver failure issues and children killed in Africa trials. Not only was no one "concilliatory", they insisted it could not be due to Trovan.
I, too, do not take prescription drugs (although I have a stash of Ivermectin I'm on the fence about), and I was also debating a tentanus shot until the last two years unfolded. Now, no more shots, no more allopathic doctors for me. That profession is corrupt to the core.
Oh my god!! Wow! That is the kind of thing that I'm talking about. I mean, in a not-good way, I'm kind of "lucky" that all I had were the problems that I mentioned. That way I learned about how they operate and can still "luckily" walk (tendons ripped off my left ankle, which is a known side effect of Levaquin). So no more running for me but otherwise, I'm still good.
Your post just rings so typical of what I've come to know about how it works. And people are surprised about doctors going along with the poison gene therapy. I'm not. Sorry to say, this is what they've made themselves out to be.
If you look up the MATH+ protocol (IIRC), you can find out similar natural therapeutics to substitute for ivermection but that one is pretty safe from what I've heard -- "strangely" that is what they don't want anyone to have! Maybe not so strange after all, huh?
He did not say the two jabs did not provide protection against Covid-19 - he said they provided limited protection against Omicron. There actually is data showing the jabs do lessen severity of disease during a window of - up to - 3 months (after the 14 day period when they actually make you more susceptible to the illness). And the after those three months there's the inconvenient data showing negative efficacy... So, the two shots either wane dramatically in effectiveness or they aren't up to tackling Omicron, or both. Bottom line, anyone who thinks mandating them at this point is criminally nuts.
"Pfizer’s chief executive has revealed that two doses of its current Covid-19 vaccine offer “very limited protection, if any” against the Omicron variant." from the original article. He did not say Covid 19 just. So, this article belongs in the TZ. Starting with the headline it is misleading. BTW, I'm antivax, but let the facts speak for themselves
Strange how the “vax” pushers never mention one side effect when pushing these EUA concoctions in the media. For any other drug being advertised, the spots include a litany of things which could go wrong. Of course the shots are hailed as “public service” and seem to be excluded from any and all adverse events concerns. Isn’t Bourla a veterinarian?
There are no side effects with a new drug put out in an emergency. None are known. Under an EUA, they also do not have to disclose ingredients or have consistency between batches. You really are a lab rat. It mystifies me how ANYBODY would be willing to inject themselves with this - note - my own doctor volunteered for the first Moderna trial...The scary thing is, they seem to be making every effort not to admit to any adverse events and deaths even as data keeps rolling in. The government is also blocking any effective early treatment. This does not bode well for the herd.
Yes, Mr. Bourla is vet. He is not a medical doctor.
Given the animal testing (that normally occurs...), being a vet seems like an applicable qualification for drug develpment.
Well, let's think about this for a second. If you go see your doctor and they think you need some medicine for some treatment, will they ever say, "this is not safe or effective, but let's give it a try!"?
In fact, I've never been given a prescription in my life that has not come with a very lengthy list of possible adverse reactions and dangerous drug interactions. Never a word about that.
I was given an antibiotic and went into anaphylaxis, had to go to the ICU, a few years back. A second antibiotic of the same family was prescribed and I developed severe tendon problems because of it which is a known possibility. I learned of this, of course, after the fact and not even from my doctor.
My doctor, upon hearing all of this went for a third common antibiotic and exclaim that was "since you're so sensitive." Not a conciliatory word. Just press on with some other drug and again, absent a single word of possible adverse reactions.
This is "the science" today. This is modern medicine. This is why I have abandoned all prescription meds and no longer even have "my doctor". Unless and until I am on deaths door and its knocking loudly, I'm through with this practice.
I do use medicinal herbs from a licensed practitioner and occasionally some acupuncture. After this culling by experimental gene therapy, you have to be insane to not rethink involving your life with pharmaceuticals and the evil people that push them.
My mother went into a coma after a single Trovan pill. They lined her up for a liver transplant due to that single pill. We didn't know that Trovan was, at that very moment, being pulled from the market due to liver failure issues and children killed in Africa trials. Not only was no one "concilliatory", they insisted it could not be due to Trovan.
I, too, do not take prescription drugs (although I have a stash of Ivermectin I'm on the fence about), and I was also debating a tentanus shot until the last two years unfolded. Now, no more shots, no more allopathic doctors for me. That profession is corrupt to the core.
Oh my god!! Wow! That is the kind of thing that I'm talking about. I mean, in a not-good way, I'm kind of "lucky" that all I had were the problems that I mentioned. That way I learned about how they operate and can still "luckily" walk (tendons ripped off my left ankle, which is a known side effect of Levaquin). So no more running for me but otherwise, I'm still good.
Your post just rings so typical of what I've come to know about how it works. And people are surprised about doctors going along with the poison gene therapy. I'm not. Sorry to say, this is what they've made themselves out to be.
If you look up the MATH+ protocol (IIRC), you can find out similar natural therapeutics to substitute for ivermection but that one is pretty safe from what I've heard -- "strangely" that is what they don't want anyone to have! Maybe not so strange after all, huh?
Thank you for the IIRC tip!
He did not say the two jabs did not provide protection against Covid-19 - he said they provided limited protection against Omicron. There actually is data showing the jabs do lessen severity of disease during a window of - up to - 3 months (after the 14 day period when they actually make you more susceptible to the illness). And the after those three months there's the inconvenient data showing negative efficacy... So, the two shots either wane dramatically in effectiveness or they aren't up to tackling Omicron, or both. Bottom line, anyone who thinks mandating them at this point is criminally nuts.
"Pfizer’s chief executive has revealed that two doses of its current Covid-19 vaccine offer “very limited protection, if any” against the Omicron variant." from the original article. He did not say Covid 19 just. So, this article belongs in the TZ. Starting with the headline it is misleading. BTW, I'm antivax, but let the facts speak for themselves
Let him keep talking. He’s digging fast. I am sure he can feel the heat from the gate hinges already.
We know who the real criminals are, and it will not be forgotten.
I am the criminal.
Of course despite terrorist Albert, who made a deal with Ursula to smooth the rollouts by promotion of her hubbie,
He will enjoy his freedom, Arrogance, and money made off elimination of our sovereignty while being as evil as can be
Albert Bourla is the devil.
He has a special place in the hell he made for us all
Horrible excuse for a human being. Justice awaits him and the rest of the real criminals.